Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
TGP Communications LLC et al v. Sellers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01925
Plaintiff: TGP Communications LLC a Missouri limited liability company doing business as Gateway Pundit and Jordan Conradson
Defendant: Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, Bill Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kari Lake, et al v. Katie Hobbs, et al
as 22-16413
Plaintiff / Appellant: KARI LAKE and MARK FINCHEM
Defendant / Appellee: KATIE HOBBS, Arizona Secretary of State, BILL GATES, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, CLINT HICKMAN, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Lake et al v. Hobbs et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00677
Plaintiff: Kari Lake and Mark Finchem
Defendant: Kathleen Hobbs, Bill Gates, Clint Hickman and others
Amicus Curiae: Arizona Republican Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GALVIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv75370
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff: THOMAS GALVIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GALVIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv68057
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff: THOMAS GALVIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Montanez v. City of Syracuse et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2016cv00550
Plaintiff: Maleatra Montanez
Defendant: City of Syracuse , Chester D. Thompson, Frank L Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA et al v. ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv08143
Plaintiff: COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA , BRIAN P. REILLY , THOMAS GALVIN and others
Defendant: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. , PHILLIPE CAMUS, MICHEL COMBES and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
New York State Rifle and Pisto v. Cuomo
as 14-37
Defendant: Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney for Erie County, Gerald J. Gill, Chief of Police for the Town of Lancaster, New York and Lawrence Friedman
Amicus Curiae: State of Kentucky, Law Enforcement Action Network, Empire State Arms Collectors Association, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: William Nojay, Blueline Tactical & Police Supply, LLC, Sportsmen's Association for Firearms Education, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., John Amidon, Reuel A. Todd, Oswego County Sheriff and others
Defendant / Appellant: Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York, Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York and Joseph A. D'Amico, Superintendent of the New York State Police
New York State Rifle and Pisto v. Cuomo
as 14-37
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant: William Nojay, Thomas Galvin, Roger Horvath and others
Defendant: Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney for Erie County, Gerald J. Gill, Chief of Police for the Town of Lancaster, New York and Lawrence Friedman
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York, Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York and Joseph A. D'Amico, Superintendent of the New York State Police
New York State Rifle and Pisto v. Cuomo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-36
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: William Nojay, Thomas Galvin, Roger Horvath and others
Defendant - Appellee: Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney for Erie County, Gerald J. Gill, Chief of Police for the Town of Lancaster, New York and Lawrence Friedman
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant: Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York, Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York and Joseph A. D'Amico, Superintendent of the New York State Police

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?