Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Jeremy Dunn, et al v. Shane Penfield, et al
as 24-1804
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dunn and Kevin Love
Defendant:
Shane Penfield, in his official and individual capacities, Penfield Law Firm Professional LLC, Marty Jackley, in his individual capacity and others
HANSEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19937
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HANSEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HANSEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv32058
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HANSEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hansen v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv01003
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Corder v. Wilhelm et al
as 3:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Deputy William Wilhelm, Pete Dougherty, Jefferson County Sherriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jason Corder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HANSEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv08713
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HANSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANSEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv57509
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HANSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANSEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv27570
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HANSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANSEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv04197
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HANSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evanston Insurance Company v. Oseran Hahn PS et al
as 2:2020cv00637
Defendant:
James Clark, Thomas Lofton, David Tall and others
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
