Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Veenaben Patel, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 21-17024
Petitioner / Appellant: VEENABEN DHIRUBHAI PATEL and AJAY RAMABHAI PATEL
Respondent / Appellee: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Former U.S. Attorney General, CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, THOMAS HOMAN, Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Akande v. Philips
as 21-1350
Defendant: John Doe, 3 and 4, The Co-Pilot of Giant Airline, Thomas Homan, Acting Director of I.C.E., Washington, D.C., Kirstjen Nielsen, The Secretary of D.H.S., Washington, D.C. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jason Shola Akande
Defendant / Appellee: Michael Philips
Aigbekaen v. Nielson
as 21-969
Defendant: Kelly Baird, Special Agent, Homeland Security Investigations, in her official capacity, Christine Nielson, Secretary of DHS, in her official capacity and Thomas Homan, Acting Director of CBP, in his official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant: Raymond I. Aigbekaen
Defendant / Appellee: Officer Leonardo A. Cabrera, United States Customs and Border Protection, Officer John Klisouriotis, United States Customs and Border Protection and Officer Wendy M. Fu, United States Customs and Border Protection
K.O., et al v. Jefferson B. Sessions, et al
as 20-5255
Defendant / Appellee: Matthew T. Albence, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, Mark A. Morgan, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, John Doe Ice Agents and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: C.J., by and through his father and next friend F.C., K.O., by and through their parents and next friends, E.O. and L.J., F.C. and others
Jose Obando-Segura v. William Barr We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-7736
Respondent / Appellee: THOMAS HOMAN, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, CHARLES LEE, Assistant Field Office Director, Enforcement and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration Customs Enforcement, CHAD WOLF, Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner / Appellant: JOSE ANDRES OBANDO-SEGURA
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00863
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Binod Shah v. Jackson Parish Corrtl Ctr, et al
as 19-30751
Petitioner / Appellant: BINOD SHAH
Respondent / Appellee: WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, ACTING SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Detention & Removal Operations and others
Yolany Padilla, et al v. ICE, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-35565
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID SHINN, Warden, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, MARC J. MOORE, Seattle Field Office Director, ICE and others
Defendant: JOHN P. SANDERS, Acting Commissioner of CBP, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, FKA Department of Social Services, MATTHEW ALBENCE, Acting Deputy Director of ICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: IBIS GUZMAN, BLANCA ORANTES, BALTAZAR VASQUEZ and others
Nestor Loera Arellano v. William Barr We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1574
Defendant / Appellee: J. D. THORPE, Atlanta Field Office Director for the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, SDDO VERONDA, ATD Supervisor United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NESTOR VICENTE LOERA ARELLANO
Francisco Mena v. William Barr We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-6352
Respondent / Appellee: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey, KRISTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner / Appellant: FRANCISCO ALBERTO MENA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?