Cases 1 - 10 of 21
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2022cv00215
Defendant:
LISA A. WENEY, THOMAS J. DAVIS, JR. and LISA COLE-DAVIS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Davis v. United States of America
as 8:2019cv01031
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Davis
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Davies, Jr. v. Israel et al
as 0:2018cv60637
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Davies, Jr.
Defendant:
Scott Israel , McMorris Magliore, Germaine McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
DAVIS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2018cv00096
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J DAVIS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Tawe v. Roesler
as 4:2017cv03404
Plaintiff:
Richard N. Tawe
Defendant:
Michael A Roesler, Charles H. Landis, Robert J. Jenkins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Scanlon et al
as 3:2016cv02528
Plaintiff:
Shannon D. Brown
Defendant:
Shane Scanlon, Thomas J. Davis, Vincent R. Butkiewicz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The City of Scranton v. Davis et al
as 3:2016mc00052
Plaintiff:
The City of Scranton
Defendant:
Thomas J. Davis and Patricia A. Davis
The City of Scranton v. Davis et al
as 3:2016cv01727
Plaintiff:
The City of Scranton
Defendant:
Thomas J. Davis and Patricia A. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Scanlon et al
as 3:2014cv01885
Plaintiff:
Raheem Jones
Defendant:
Shane M. Scanlon, Thomas J. Davis and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quintero Community Assoc. Inc., et al v. FDIC as Receiver, et al
as 14-2266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Quintero Community Association Inc., Lyle P. Phillips, Phillips W. Upham, II and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Hillcrest Bank, Private Club Financial Management, Crossover Capital LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
