Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Lu v. Menino et al
as 1:2014cv13053
Defendant:
Thomas M. Menino , Martin J. Walsh , William F. Sinnott and others
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Raja v. Hulme, et al
as 14-1181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INDRA KARAN RAJA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE HULME, OFFICER MCNULTY and OFFICER KELLY
Defendant:
ACTION FOR BOSTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, INC., BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY, TRUSTEES, BOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM, INC. and others
Wong, et al v. O'Neil, et al
as 12-8026
Petitioner:
KONSTANTINE CHRISTOS BAZAKAS and SHU SHEAN WONG
Respondent:
FRAZIER O'NEIL PROFIT, PROBATE AND FAMILY COURT DEPARTMENT MIDDLESEX COUNTY DIVISION, DREW GILPIN FAUST, as president of Harvard University and others
Re'Voal v. Patrick, et al
as 12-1577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM RE'VOAL
Defendant - Appellee:
DEVAL PATRICK, THOMAS M. MENINO, BARBARA FERRER, Boston Public Health Commissioner and others
Watson v. Davis, et al
as 11-2235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE WATSON
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD DAVIS, Commissioner, in his individual and official capacity, THOMAS M. MENINO, BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Ruiz et al v. Menino et al
as 1:2011cv10068
Plaintiff:
Virgilio Ruiz and Santo Ruiz
Defendant:
Thomas M. Menino, Paul F. Evans and Rafael William Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Pulido v. Boston, City of et al
as 1:2010cv11986
Plaintiff:
Roberto E. Pulido
Defendant:
Boston, City of, Thomas M. Menino, Kathleen M. O'Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koplow v. Menino
as 09-2177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEE KOPLOW
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS M. MENINO
Nwachuku, et al v. Walsh, et al
as 09-1982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXANDER C. NWACHUKU and JOEATTA K. SMITH-NWACHUKU
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL WALSH, JOHN KELLY, SEAN JOYCE and others
Defendant:
PLYMOUTH COUNTY, EDDY CHRISPIN, JOHN M. BUCKLEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
