Cases 1 - 10 of 164
Eutihia Joy Maria Mega v. Grand Bell, LLC, et al.
as 2:2024cv01451
Plaintiff:
Eutihia Joy Maria Mega and Los Angeles County Superior Court
Defendant:
Grand Bell, LLC, Thomas Martin Cordova, Steven Jones Meng and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Happle et al v. Ishbia et al
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Martin Happle and Carla Happle
Defendant:
Mat Ishbia, James Daras, McCalla Raymer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Happle v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant:
Kathleen Wilson, Doctor John Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Happle v. Wubbenhorst et al
as 1:2023cv01402
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant:
Andrew Wubbenhorst, Kim Kassar and Criger's Towing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Happle v. D'Angelo
as 1:2023cv01399
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant:
Dana D'Angelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Happle v. John
as 1:2023cv01401
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant:
Judge John Paparrazzo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Happle v. Wilson et al
as 1:2023cv01400
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant:
C. P. Wilson and M. Staton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Martin v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2023cv05241
Plaintiff:
Thomas Martin
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv29139
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv23373
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
