Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Charles Monroe v. Deputy Warden, et al
as 13-3202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES THOMAS MONROE
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPUTY WARDEN, NATASHA HOLLINGSWORTH, Staff-Lt., MICHAEL PEARSON, K-9 Officer and others
Charles Monroe v. Christopher Klein, et al
as 12-4287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES THOMAS MONROE
Defendant - Appellee:
NATASHA HOLLINGSWORTH, Staff, MICHAEL PEARSON, K-9 Officer, BENSON, Staff and others
Monroe v. Klein et al
as 1:2012cv00723
Plaintiff:
Charles Thomas Monroe
Defendant:
Christopher Klein, Natasha Hollingsworth, Michael Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monroe v. Urch et al
as 1:2012cv01357
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas Monroe
Defendant:
Neal Urch and Spartanburg Co Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monroe v. Urch et al
as 8:2012cv01357
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas Monroe
Defendant:
Neal Urch, Spartanburg Co Detention Facility, Officer Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01318
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas Carter v. Calvin Ramsey, et al
as 10-15359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS MONROE CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CALVIN RAMSEY, ALEXIS CHASE and BURNSIDE
Monroe v. Phelps et al
as 1:2009cv01004
Plaintiff:
Charles Thomas Monroe
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Michael Bryan and Raymond Hannum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2009cv00131
Plaintiff:
Thomas Monroe Carter
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Johnson State Prison, Calvin Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Monroe v. Phelps et al
as 1:2009cv00238
Petitioner:
Charles Thomas Monroe
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
