Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Oates Food Services II, LLC v. City Council of the City of Norfolk, Virginia
as 2:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
Oates Food Services II, LLC
Defendant:
City Council of the City of Norfolk, Virginia, in its official capacity, Kenneth Cooper Alexander, Martin A. Thomas, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Ronald Green v. Loretta Lynch
as 15-1378
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY L. PERRY-BEY and RONALD M. GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General, in his individual and official capacity, ANGELA J. MILLER, U.S. Attorney, Voting Section, in her individual and official capacity, T. CHRISTIAN HERREN, Chief U.S. Attorney, in his individual and official capacity and others
Ronald Green v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-1761
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD M. GREEN
Plaintiff:
ROY L. PERRY-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General, in his individual and official capacity, ANGELA J. MILLER, U.S. Attorney, Voting Section, in her individual and official capacity, T. CHRISTIAN HERREN, Chief U.S. Attorney, in his individual and official capacity and others
Perry-Bey et al v. Holder et al
as 1:2014cv00215
Plaintiff:
Roy L. Perry-Bey and Ronald M. Green
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Angela J. Miller, T. Christian Herren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
PERRY-BEY et al v. CITY OF NORFOLK VIRGINIA et al
as 2:2013cv00250
Plaintiff:
Roy L. Perry-Bey and Ronald M. Green
Defendant:
Virginia City Of Norfolk, Paul D. Fraim, ANTHONY L. BURFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PERRY-BEY et al v. CITY OF NORFOLK VIRGINIA et al
as 1:2013cv00500
Plaintiff:
ROY L. PERRY-BEY and RONALD M. GREEN
Defendant:
CITY OF NORFOLK VIRGINIA, PAUL D. FRAIM, ANTHONY L. BURFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
