Cases 1 - 10 of 93
White, Jr. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 2:2024cv04625
Plaintiff:
Thomas Roger White, Jr.
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co LTD
Rogers v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00622
Plaintiff:
Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White, Jr. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 9:2024mc80360
Plaintiff:
Thomas Roger White, Jr.
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Douglas v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv03130
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Douglas
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Jasmine Magee, Kelley Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hafner v. DeLaura et al
as 6:2023cv00507
Plaintiff:
Robert Duane Hafner
Defendant:
Unknown DeLaura, Unknown Garcia, Unknown Murdock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Douglas
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Jasmine Magee, Kelley Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Williams v. City of Hawthorne et al
as 2:2023cv06646
Defendant:
Doe Pabuelo, Doe Espinoza, M.D. Stephan T. Honda and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15803
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ROGERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rogers v. Reid et al
as 2:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
Gregory J Reid and Pamela Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Blount County, Mark Moon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
