Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Futrell v. Scarantino
as 5:2023hc02258
Petitioner:
Jule C. Futrell
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
FUTRELL v. SCARANTINO
as 1:2023cv00676
Petitioner:
JULE C. FUTRELL
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMAS SCARANTINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dodge v. Scarantino
as 5:2023hc02155
Petitioner:
Codi Dodge
Respondent:
Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carrington v. Scarantino et al
as 5:2023ct03182
Plaintiff:
Theodore Macon Carrington, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Thomas Scarantino, Federal Medical Center and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rios v. Scarantino
as 5:2023hc02108
Petitioner:
Antonio Rios
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Park v. Scarantino
as 5:2023ct03137
Plaintiff:
Joseph Park
Defendant:
Warden Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cassaday v. Scarantino
as 5:2022hc02199
Petitioner:
Kevin W. Cassaday
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Shelton v. Scarantino
as 5:2022hc02196
Petitioner:
Kenneth E. Shelton
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gray v. Scarantino
as 5:2022hc02197
Petitioner:
Jaquavius Laquan Gray
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gargan v. Moser et al
as 5:2022ct03354
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Gargan
Defendant:
Vicky Moser, Kim Swindell, Donald Eppley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
