Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Thule Organization Solutions, Inc. v. Mizco International, Inc.
as 1:2013cv03160
Plaintiff:
Thule Organization Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Mizco International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0101
Thule Organization Solutions, Inc. v. Rocketfish Products
as 1:2013cv00546
Plaintiff:
Thule Organization Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Rocketfish Products
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0101 (35:101 Patent Infringement)
Thule Organization Solutions, Inc. v. Merkury Innovations LLC
as 1:2012cv01809
Plaintiff:
Thule Organization Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Merkury Innovations LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0101
Thule Organization Solutions, Inc. v. Sakar International
as 1:2012cv00469
Plaintiff:
Thule Organization Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Sakar International
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0101
Thule Organization Solutions, Inc. v. Small Dog Electronics, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00471
Plaintiff:
Thule Organization Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Small Dog Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0101
Thule Organization Solutions, Inc. v. LightWedge, LLC
as 1:2012cv00470
Plaintiff:
Thule Organization Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
LightWedge, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0101
Thule Organization Solutions, Inc. v. Kensington Computer Product Group
as 1:2011cv00845
Plaintiff:
Thule Organization Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Kensington Computer Product Group
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Thule Organization Solutions, Inc. v. KrooUSA, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00386
Plaintiff:
Thule Organization Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
KrooUSA, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
KrooUSA, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Thule Organization Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0101
Thule Organization Solutions, Inc. v. AGVA Singapore PTE LTD
as 1:2009cv02640
Plaintiff:
Thule Organization Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
AGVA Singapore PTE LTD
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.