Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Travis v. Tibbs et al
as 2:2024cv00492
Defendant:
Steve Caudill, Superintendent Jason Hutson and Lieutenant Timothy Tibbs
Plaintiff:
Denzel Travis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00159
Defendant:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs and John/Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeal v. Sams et al
as 5:2024cv00149
Defendant:
Officer McComas, Lt. Timothy Tibbs, Sgt Timothy Abner and others
Plaintiff:
Frankie Dewayne McNeal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutter v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Damien Rutter
Respondent:
Michael Costello and Lt. Timothy Tibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeemer v. Tibbs
as 5:2024cv00115
Respondent:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs
Petitioner:
Richard McNeemer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shields v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jacob Shields
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe and Lt. Timothy Tibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mackey v. Tibbs et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Respondent:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs and Corporal Michael Costello
Petitioner:
Daniel Mackey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smallwood v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Carl Smallwood
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Timothy Tibbs and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allman v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Ronald Allman, II
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Tibbs, Correctional Officer Sams and Corr. Officer II Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutter v. Tibbs et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Damien Rutter
Defendant:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs, Corporal Michael Costello and Steve Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
