Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Tigress McDaniel v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
as 25-1260
Plaintiff:
TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL
Defendant:
SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC., SUN PHARMACEUTICAL MEDICARE LIMITED and others
Tigress McDaniel v. State of North Carolina, et al
as 24-7198
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Christopher J. Loebsack, Bar No. 23429, Guilford County 24th Judicial District and others
Plaintiff:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tigress McDaniel v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
as 24-2002
Defendant:
SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC., SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., SUN PHARMACEUTICAL MEDICARE LIMITED and others
Plaintiff:
TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2004
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McDaniel v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 3:2024cv00823
Defendant:
Sun Pharmaceutical Medicare Limited, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
North Carolina State Bar v. Tigress McDaniel
as 24-1840
Defendant:
TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR
Tigress McDaniel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 24-1797
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL MID-ATLANTIC INSURANCE COMPANY, LIBERTY MUTUAL MANAGED CARE, INC., LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP ASSET MANAGEMENT INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL
The North Carolina State Bar v. McDaniel
as 5:2024cv00321
Defendant:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Plaintiff:
The North Carolina State Bar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
