Cases 11 - 20 of 24
North v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2010cv00300
Plaintiff:
Tillman North
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Warden Barret, Mrs. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
North v. Daniels et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00205
Plaintiff:
Tillman North
Defendant:
Warden Daniels, Elmore Correctional Facility and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
North v. Lewis et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2010cv00206
Plaintiff:
Tillman North
Defendant:
Officer Lewis, Department of Corrections and Elmore Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
North v. Elmore Correctional Facility (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00164
Plaintiff:
Tillman North
Defendant:
Elmore Correctional Facility K-9 Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
North v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2010cv00089
Plaintiff:
Tillman North
Defendant:
Officer Ware
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
North v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2010cv00093
Plaintiff:
Tillman North
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Department of Corrections K-9 Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
North v. Little
as 1:2008cv00122
Plaintiff:
Tillman North
Defendant:
Sgt. Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
North v. Ferrell
as 1:2007cv00689
Petitioner:
Tillman North
Respondent:
Jerry Ferrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
North v. NAACP
as 1:2007cv00666
Plaintiff:
Tillman North
Defendant:
NAACP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
North v. Atmore City Police Department et al
as 1:2007cv00657
Plaintiff:
Tillman North
Defendant:
Atmore City Police Department and Scott Walden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
