Cases 1 - 10 of 333
Johnson v. Hooper
as 25-30261
Petitioner:
Phillip Orlando Ealy Johnson
Defendant:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Guidry v. Hooper et al
as 3:2025cv00384
Plaintiff:
Eugene Lamond Guidry
Defendant:
Tim Hooper, D Brown, Tyrenni T. Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Page v. Hooper et al
as 3:2025cv00266
Plaintiff:
David Page
Defendant:
Tim Hooper, Darryal Vannoy, Jacob C. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laue v. Hooper et al
as 2:2025cv00490
Plaintiff:
Joseph Valchez Laue
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brumfield v. Hooper et al
as 2:2025cv00481
Plaintiff:
Rickie L Brumfield
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Hooper et al
as 3:2025cv00127
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Morris
Respondent:
Tim Hooper and Elizabeth Murrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guidry v. Hooper
as 2:2025cv00231
Plaintiff:
Eugene Lamond Guidry
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Guidry v. Hooper et al
as 2:2025cv00230
Plaintiff:
Eugene Lamond Guidry
Defendant:
Tim Hooper, D Brown, Tyrenni T Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. LA Dept Pub Sfty Corr
as 25-30031
Plaintiff:
Curtis Gordon
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Tim Hooper, Warden and James M. LeBlanc, Head Director, District Attorney Department
Laue v. Hooper et al
as 3:2025cv00066
Petitioner:
Joseph Valchez Laue
Respondent:
Tim Hooper and Elizabeth Murrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
