Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Williams v. Tim Hortons USA Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv10960
Plaintiff:
Colette Williams
Defendant:
Tim Hortons USA Inc., Mar Group Inc, Mar Orchard Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Picktown Foods, LLC et al v. Tim Hortons USA, Inc.
as 1:2017cv21072
Plaintiff:
Picktown Foods, LLC , QSR Enterprises, LLC , Hepta Foods, LLC and others
Defendant:
Tim Hortons USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tim Hortons USA Inc. v. Singh et al
as 1:2016cv23041
Plaintiff:
Tim Hortons USA Inc. and Tim Donut U.S. Limited, Inc.
Defendant:
Gurvinder Singh, Ashna Walia, Adarsh Walia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yepez v. 26 Court Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv02628
Defendant:
26 Court Associates, LLC and Tim Hortons USA Inc.
Plaintiff:
Julia Yepez
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
DietGoal Innovations LLC v. Arby's Restaurant Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00418
Plaintiff:
DietGoal Innovations LLC
Defendant:
Arby's Restaurant Group, Inc. , ABP Corporation , Bojangle's Restaurants Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Doctor's Associates Inc , Kraft Foods Inc. and Rodale, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
DietGoal Innovations LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Johnson et al v. City of Antioch et al
as 3:2009cv03153
Plaintiff:
Jesse Johnson and Tim Horton
Defendant:
City of Antioch, Antioch Police Department, James Hyde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
