Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Brennan v. Wengler
as 1:2013cv00128
Petitioner:
Peter J. Brennan
Respondent:
Tim Wengler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hogue v. Armfield et al
as 1:2013cv00088
Plaintiff:
Brian Elliott Hogue
Defendant:
Melodee Armfield, Shane Jepsen and Tim Wengler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roman v. Wengler
as 1:2013cv00082
Petitioner:
Alfredo Roman
Respondent:
Tim Wengler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corwin v. Wengler
as 1:2013cv00037
Respondent:
Tim Wengler
Petitioner:
Larry Dean Corwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stearns v. Wengler et al
as 1:2013cv00019
Petitioner:
Stacy Warren Stearns
Respondent:
Tim Wengler, Idaho Board of Correction and Lawrence Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kesling v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2012cv00599
Plaintiff:
Shawn M Kesling
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Idaho Department of Corrections, Tim Higgins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. IDOC et al
as 1:2012cv00580
Plaintiff:
Richard M Caldwell
Defendant:
IDOC, ICC, CCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepherd v. Corrections Corporation of America, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00571
Plaintiff:
Charles T Shepherd
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, LLC, Todd J Mullinger, David Agler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caplinger v. CCA et al
as 1:2012cv00537
Plaintiff:
Neal Wayne Caplinger
Defendant:
CCA, Tim Wengler, Thomas Kessler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Wengler
as 1:2012cv00539
Petitioner:
Charles E. Smith
Defendant:
Tim Wengler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
