Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Dillon v. Westscott et al
as 3:2025cv00268
Plaintiff:
Curtis E. Dillon
Defendant:
Gary Westscott, Timothy Hooper, Carl Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rachal v. LA Dept Pub Sfty and Corr
as 25-30186
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Rachal
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Timothy Hooper, Warden of Louisiana State Penitentiary, James LeBlanc, Secretary of Department of Corrections and others
Harrison v. Hooper et al
as 2:2025cv00198
Petitioner:
Allen J Harrison
Defendant:
Timothy Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dantin v. Hooper et al
as 2:2024cv02789
Plaintiff:
Cody Dantin
Defendant:
Dayral Vanoy and Timothy Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Hooper
as 5:2024cv01612
Plaintiff:
Pernell Antonio Washington
Defendant:
Timothy Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Hooper
as 24-30731
Defendant:
Francis Smith, Eric Hinyard, Joyce Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Lewis
Morgan v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00945
Respondent:
Elizabeth Murrill and Timothy Hooper
Petitioner:
Martin Wesley Morgan, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Westcott et al
as 3:2024cv00889
Defendant:
Misty Stagg, Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections, Prison Enterprises, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricks v. St of LA Dept of Pub Sfty and Corr
as 24-30655
Defendant:
Sheriff of West Feliciana Parish, Unknown Defendants, James LeBlanc and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley Ricks
Dunbar v. Hooper
as 3:2024cv00834
Respondent:
Elizabeth Murrill and Timothy Hooper
Petitioner:
LeRoyal Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
