Cases 1 - 10 of 226
Dixon v. Rutherford Adult Dentention Center et al
as 3:2025cv00290
Plaintiff:
Noah Elijah Dixon
Defendant:
Rutherford Adult Dentention Center and Timothy William Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams #373703 v. Blough et al
as 1:2025cv00240
Plaintiff:
Timothy Williams #373703
Defendant:
Logan Blough and Unknown Lien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Brittain et al
as 3:2025cv00338
Petitioner:
Timothy Williams
Respondent:
Kathy Brittain, Pennsylvania Parole Board and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gooch v. Hudgens et al
as 1:2025cv00038
Plaintiff:
Terry Gene Gooch
Defendant:
Jerry Hudgens, Sr., Michael Coleman, Jacob Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. United States of America
as 4:2025cv00041
Petitioner:
Ricky Timothy Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 25-464
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
Williams et al v. Progressive Commercial Casualty Company
as 4:2024cv04971
Defendant:
Progressive Commercial Casualty Company
Plaintiff:
Timothy Williams and Cameron Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
FTS USA, LLC et al v. MONROE et al
as 2:2024cv11148
Petitioner:
UNITEK USA, LLC and FTS USA, LLC
Respondent:
FABIAN MOORE, TIMOTHY WILLIAMS and EDWARD MONROE
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
WILLIAMS v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2024cv00284
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY WILLIAMS
Respondent:
M. UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Washington v. Pfizer & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01262
Defendant:
DK Security Company, Timothy Williams, Next 150 Company and others
Plaintiff:
Emil Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
