Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Michaud et al v. Plex Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
David Michaud, Timothy Burke, James Domsic and others
Defendant:
Plex Systems, Inc. and Plex System Holdings, Inc.
Burke et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04149
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE BURKE and TIMOTHY BURKE
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURKE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv08874
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY BURKE
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timothy Burke v. Renew Financial Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02938
Defendant:
RENEW FINANCIAL I, Inc., RENEW FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC, A PERFECT VIEW BUILDERS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. TIMOTHY BURKE and Timothy Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURKE v. 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC et al
as 7:2021cv03503
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY BURKE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeLeon v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv08796
Defendant:
Timothy Burke, City of New York, Anthony Terilli and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew DeLeon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrill v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00064
Plaintiff:
Timothy Burke Morrill
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv11415
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Burke v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv05218
Plaintiff:
Paul Timothy Burke
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Copes v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2017cv08413
Plaintiff:
LaQuan Copes
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Gina Mestre, Timothy Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
