Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Unitrin Safeguard Insurance Company v. Campbell et al
as 1:2024cv02574
Plaintiff:
Unitrin Safeguard Insurance Company
Defendant:
Timothy Campbell and Jesy Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Williams-Clabo v. City of Knoxville et al (TV2)
as 3:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Williams-Clabo
Defendant:
City of Knoxville, Paul Noel, William Romanini and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
RIVAZ v. COOK et al
as 5:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
JARREL RIVAZ
Defendant:
JACOB COOK, RAFAEL FRANCISCO, RAYMOND MCNEIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Thornell
as 3:2023cv08020
Petitioner:
Timothy Campbell
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ALVEY et al v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
as 3:2020cv00263
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA M DAUBY, FAYE KING, LYNNE RICE and others
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pennie v. City Of Rockford et al
as 3:2019cv50120
Defendant:
City Of Rockford, Timothy Campbell and Melissa Sundly
Plaintiff:
Roger Pennie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Lund v. City of Rockford, Illinois, et al
as 19-1945
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS, a municipal corporation, SEAN WELSH, #3865, Rockford Police Officer, EDDIE TORRANCE, #0211 Rockford Police Officer, and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM LUND
Campbell et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2019cv01272
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Timothy Campbell and Suzanne Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bates v. Winnebago County et al
as 3:2018cv50006
Plaintiff:
John Bates
Defendant:
Winnebago County, Thomas Warmoth, Wesley Ganz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
