Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Rodney Pierce v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 24-1095
Plaintiff: RODNEY D. PIERCE and MOSES MATTHEWS
Defendant: THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ALAN HIRSCH, in his official capacity as Chair of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, JEFF CARMON, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae: ROY A. COOPER, III and JOSHUA STEIN
Rodney Pierce v. The North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 23-2317
Plaintiff: RODNEY D. PIERCE and MOSES MATTHEWS
Defendant: THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ALAN HIRSCH, in his official capacity as Chair of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, JEFF CARMON, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
WILLIAMS et al v. HALL et al
as 1:2023cv01057
Plaintiff: SHAUNA WILLIAMS, FLOR HERRERA-PICASSO, MINERVA FREEMAN and others
Defendant: DESTIN HALL, WARREN DANIEL, RALPH E. HISE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierce et al v. The North Carolina State Board of Elections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00193
Plaintiff: Rodney D. Pierce and Moses Matthews
Defendant: The North Carolina State Board of Elections, Alan Hirsch, Jeff Carmon III and others
Amicus Curiae: Roy A. Cooper, III and Joshua H Stein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DEMOCRACY NORTH CAROLINA et al v. HIRSCH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00878
Plaintiff: DEMOCRACY NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA BLACK ALLIANCE and LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant: ALAN HIRSCH, JEFF CARMON, III, KEVIN LEWIS and others
Intervenor Defendant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NORTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY, VIRGINIA A. WASSERBERG and others
Petitioner: PHILIP E. BERGER and TIMOTHY K. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VOE et al v. MANSFIELD et al
as 1:2023cv00864
Plaintiff: VICTOR VOE, VANESSA VOE, VANCE VOE and others
Defendant: THOMAS MANSFIELD, MICHAUX R. KILPATRICK, MD, PHD, CHRISTINE M. KHANDELWAL, DO and others
Intervenor Defendant: PHILIP E. BERGER and TIMOTHY K. MOORE
Interested Party: UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
VOTO LATINO et al v. HIRSCH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00861
Plaintiff: VOTO LATINO, THE WATAUGA COUNTY VOTING RIGHTS TASK FORCE, DOWN HOME NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant: ALAN HIRSCH, JEFF CARMON, STACY EGGERS IV and others
Intervenor Defendant: PHILIP E. BERGER, TIMOTHY K. MOORE, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY et al v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv00862
Plaintiff: NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY and DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, KAREN BRINSON BELL, ALAN HIRSCH and others
Intervenor Defendant: PHILIP E. BERGER, TIMOTHY K. MOORE, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
NORTH CAROLINA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS v. HIRSCH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00837
Plaintiff: North Carolina Alliance For Retired Americans
Defendant: Alan Hirsch, Jeff Carmon, Stacy Eggers IV and others
Intervenor Defendant: PHILIP E. BERGER and TIMOTHY K. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC et al v. STEIN et al
as 1:2023cv00480
Plaintiff: PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC and Dr. BEVERLY GRAY, MD
Defendant: JOSHUA STEIN, TODD M. WILLIAMS, JIM O'NEILL and others
Intervenor Defendant: PHILIP E. BERGER and TIMOTHY K. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?