Cases 1 - 10 of 11
REDD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55196
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY REDD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REDD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv45240
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY REDD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeFilippo v. County of Stanislaus et al
as 1:2018cv00496
Defendant:
County of Stanislaus, City of Modesto, City of Turlock and others
Plaintiff:
Georgia DeFilippo and Christina DeFilippo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. County of Stanislaus et al
as 1:2018at00269
Defendant:
County of Stanislaus, City of Modesto, City of Turlock and others
Plaintiff:
Christina DeFilippo and Georgia DeFilippo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Athwal et al v. County of Stanislaus et al
as 1:2015at00155
Plaintiff:
Baljit Athwal , Navneet Athwal , Daljit Atwal and others
Defendant:
County of Stanislaus, City of Turlock, City of Modesto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Athwal et al v. County of Stanislaus et al
as 1:2015cv00311
Plaintiff:
Baljit Athwal , Navneet Athwal , Daljit Atwal and others
Defendant:
County of Stanislaus , City of Turlock, City of Modesto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Redd v. USA
as 14-1864
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY REDD, also known as TIMOTHY REED, also known as T-DOG
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Redd v. Rios
as 1:2013cv01172
Petitioner:
Timothy Redd
Respondent:
Ricardo Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Redd v. USA
as 1:2013cv00078
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Timothy Redd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Khinoo v. Redd et al
as 1:2011cv01322
Plaintiff:
Donald Khinoo
Defendant:
Timothy Redd, J. Rodriguez, John Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
