Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Marcus v. Titan America, LLC
as 8:2022cv01135
Plaintiff:
McKinley Marcus
Defendant:
Titan America, LLC and Titan Florida, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Carlos Burreuzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv20411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
ALBELO v. TITAN AMERICA LLC
as 1:2022cv20401
Plaintiff:
YOEL ALBELO
Defendant:
TITAN AMERICA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Stephens v. Titan America LLC
as 3:2021cv00910
Plaintiff:
Andrew Stephens
Defendant:
Titan America LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
MELENDEZ v. Titan America, LLC
as 1:2021cv20500
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MELENDEZ
Defendant:
Titan America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv60433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Ordiozola v. Titan America LLC et al
as 1:2016cv22342
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ordiozola
Defendant:
Titan America LLC , Bill Zarkalis and Titan Florida LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Titan America LLC, et al v. Darrell, et al
as 7:2011cv00052
Plaintiff:
Titan America LLC and Carolinas Cement Company LLC
Defendant:
Kayne O. Darrell and David L. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keys Contracting Services, Inc. v. Cemex Corp. et al
as 4:2009cv10113
Plaintiff:
Keys Contracting Services, Inc., Keys Contracting Services, Inc. and Keys Contracting Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Cemex Corp., Florida Rock Industries, Inc., Holcim (US) Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
