Cases 1 - 10 of 2,024
Stone v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Jackie Wayne Stone
Defendant:
Barry T. Smith, Taylor County Detention Center, Hack Marcum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dental Health Services Inc et al v. Miller et al
as 2:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
Dental Health Services, Inc., Dental Health Services and Dental Health Services of America
Defendant:
Toby Miller, Josh Nace and DOES 1 through 50
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2023cv05204
Plaintiff:
Toby Higa
Defendant:
Legacy Health and northwest acute care specialists
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Price v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv02051
Plaintiff:
Toby Price
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
James v. Conn et al
as 2:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
Toby Ray James
Defendant:
Brad Conn, Heather Patterson and Mike Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 7:2023cv00022
Petitioner:
Toby Lawrence Montgomery
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gardner et al v. Matco Tools Corporation
as 5:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
Toby Clarkson Gardner and Keston Lewis
Defendant:
Matco Tools Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Evanston Insurance Company v. North Arkansas Regional Medical Center et al
as 3:2023cv03013
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Defendant:
North Arkansas Regional Medical Center, Toby Olen Cordova and Alexandra Mann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
