Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Vickery et al v. McBride et al
as 8:2023cv05647
Plaintiff:
Russell Vickery, Matthew Richey, Charles Williams and others
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad McBride, Captain David Baker, Admin. Lt. Nathan Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Tabb et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04824
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Tabb, Carter Slusher, Anthony Smalls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Moore v. Stirling
as 1:2022cv02202
Petitioner:
Toby E. Moore and Toby Eugene Moore
Respondent:
Bryan P. Stirling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hixon v. King et al
as 8:2022cv01240
Plaintiff:
Bret Kyle Hixon
Defendant:
Daniel King, Karen Roper, Shannon Ellenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01772
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams et al v. Holiday Inn Club Vacations et al
as 4:2020cv00997
Plaintiff:
Shelly Adam, Gwendolyn Barilleux, Lisa Manno and others
Defendant:
Orange Lake Resorts, Roe Corporations, 1-10, Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00298
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore v. Williams
as 1:2019cv01648
Petitioner:
Toby Eugene Moore
Respondent:
Warden Charles Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hayes v. Vereen
as 9:2019cv01420
Defendant:
Warden W. Vereen
Plaintiff:
Christopher Toby Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
