Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Aurit v. Owens et al
as 1:2022cv02912
Plaintiff:
Todd A. Aurit
Defendant:
Bill Owens, John Kellner, Kathleen McGuire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aurit v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2020cv00429
Plaintiff:
Todd Anthony Aurit
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Scott Dauffenbach, Phil Weiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aurit v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2018cv01973
Defendant:
Colorado Dept. of Corrections, System District Attorney for the Eighteenth Judicial System, State of Colorado and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Anthony Aurit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aurit v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2018cv00057
Plaintiff:
Todd Anthony Aurit
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Colorado Department of Corrections, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aurit v. Suthers et al
as 1:2014cv01018
Plaintiff:
Todd Anthony Aurit
Defendant:
John W. Suthers, John (I) W. Suthers, Angel Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Aurit v. Suthers et al
as 1:2013cv02427
Plaintiff:
Todd Anthony Aurit
Defendant:
John W. Suthers, Angel Medina, Gerald Marronney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aurit v. Medina et al
as 1:2013cv02426
Plaintiff:
Todd A Aurit
Defendant:
Angel Medina, Loe Archuleta, Ron Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aurit v. Hopf, et al
as 11-1163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD ANTHONY AURIT, a Chiristian Sovereign Secured Party Creditor
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY A. HOPF, PAUL KING, RICHARD CASHETTE and others
Aurit v. Douglas County District Court et al
as 1:2010cv02703
Plaintiff:
Todd Anthony Aurit
Defendant:
Douglas County District Court, Nancy Hopf, Paul King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aurit et al v. King et al
as 1:2010cv02698
Petitioner:
Todd Anthony Aurit
Respondent:
Nancy Hopf, Paul King, Richard Cashette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
