Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Hemphill v. Payne et al
as 4:2025cv00602
Plaintiff:
Jamie Hemphill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Todd Ball, Gary Kerstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Ball et al
as 2:2025cv00120
Plaintiff:
Kingrale Collins
Defendant:
R Todd Ball, Brandon Davis and Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Lane et al
as 2:2025cv00107
Plaintiff:
Cambrin Barnes
Defendant:
Stephen Lane, William F Straughn, Moses Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wennerstein v. Southerland et al

as 2:2025cv00084
Plaintiff:
James E Wennerstein
Defendant:
Southerland, Richard Todd Ball, Michael Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Ball et al
as 2:2025cv00077
Plaintiff:
Timothy Harris
Defendant:
Todd Ball, William F Straughn and M Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shifley v. Budnick et al

as 4:2025cv00391
Plaintiff:
Brent Shifley
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Harran, Todd Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Johnson et al
as 4:2025cv00303
Plaintiff:
Robert Chambers
Defendant:
Antonio Johnson, Jr, Todd Ball, Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Higgins v. Lane et al
as 2:2025cv00056
Plaintiff:
Travon D Higgins
Defendant:
Stephen Lane, William F Straughn, Mose Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxwell v. Payne et al

as 2:2025cv00045
Plaintiff:
Roderick D Maxwell
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Todd Ball, Michael Richordson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Payne et al
as 2:2025cv00044
Plaintiff:
Cambrin Barnes
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Aundrea Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.