Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MARTIN v. MCDANIEL et al
as 5:2014cv00393
Plaintiff:
JAMES M MARTIN
Defendant:
JOHNNY MCDANIEL, TRAVIS FITZGERALD, MELISSA THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. OWENS et al
as 5:2014cv00285
Plaintiff:
JOHN HENRY BROOKS, JR
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, ALAN CARTER, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Owens et al
as 1:2014cv02038
Plaintiff:
Donald Frank Smith
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Ricky Myrick, Shevonda Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANNS v. THOMPSON et al
as 5:2012cv00193
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS LAMONT MANNS
Defendant:
LINDA THOMPSON, ROBERT TOOLE, TODD TRIPP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooten v. Fowlkes et al
as 5:2011cv00115
Plaintiff:
Mark T Hooten
Defendant:
Joseph Fowlkes, Monica Hill, Robert Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamont Howard v. Scott Wilkes, et al
as 10-15118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAMONT HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT WILKES, in their individual and official capacity, DR. AYAZ CHAUDHARY, in their individual and official capacity, DR. YOUNG, in their individual and official capacity and others
Lamont Howard v. Terrie Mullis, et al
as 10-14350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAMONT HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRIE MULLIS, TODD TRIPP, DONALD BARROW and others
Howard v. Mullis et al
as 1:2010cv00036
Plaintiff:
Lamont Howard
Defendant:
Terrie Mullis, Todd Tripp, Donald Barrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Wilkes et al
as 4:2010cv00048
Plaintiff:
Lamont Howard
Defendant:
Scott Wilkes, Ayaz Chaudhary, Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Wilkes et al
as 3:2010cv00024
Plaintiff:
Lamont Howard
Defendant:
Scott Wilkes, Ayaz Chaudhary, Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
