Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Antonio Hudson v. Arthur Tarnow, et al
as 23-1016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO HUDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
HONORABLE ARTHUR J TARNOW, HONORABLE BERNARD FREIDMAN, HONORABLE PAUL J. KOMIVES and others
Seaton #322788 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01330
Plaintiff:
Ronald Seaton #322788
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Patricia Caruso, William Overton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott #136038 v. Heyns et al
as 1:2015cv00229
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Scott #136038
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, Abigail A. Callejas, Amy M. Bonito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv10776
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Russell
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Tom Combs, John B. Huss and others
Richard Crowell v. MI, et al
as 14-2399
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD CROWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, RICK SNYDER, Governor, PATRICIA CARUSO, Former Corrections Director and others
Antonio Hudson v. Arthur Tarnow, et al
as 14-2298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO HUDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
HONORABLE ARTHUR J. TARNOW, BERNARD FREIDMAN, PAUL J. KOMIVES and others
Crowell #144211 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2014cv00198
Plaintiff:
Richard Crowell #144211
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Rick Snyder, Patricia Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas O'Neil v. Todd Kloska, et al
as 14-2042
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS LEE O'NEIL
Respondent - Appellee:
TODD KLOSKA, Superving Parole Agent and TOM COMBS, Chairman, Michigan Parole Board
Smith #158371 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00553
Plaintiff:
Frederick Smith #158371
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Daniel Heyns, Tom Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv11929
Plaintiff:
Frederick Smith
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Daniel Heyns, Tom Combs and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
