Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mark White v. Correctional Medical Services, et al
as 11-2039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK EARL WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., WILLIAM NELSON and TOM LANORE
White #228524 v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01082
Plaintiff:
Mark Earl White #228524
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Michigan Department of Corrections, William Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Donald Smith v. Correctional Medical Services,, et al
as 09-2381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD M. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., as a Company or Corporation, CRAIG HUTCHINSON, Dr., in his individual capacity, WILLIAM NELSON, Dr., in his individual capacity and others
White #228524 v Correctional Medical Services, Inc., et al
as 1:2009cv00217
Plaintiff:
Mark Earl White #228524
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Tom LaNore, William Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith #302252 v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00607
Plaintiff:
Donald M. Smith #302252
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Craig Hutchinson, W. Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
White #228524 v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00277
Plaintiff:
Mark Earl White #228524
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Craig Hutchinson, S. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith #302252 v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00274
Plaintiff:
Donald M. Smith #302252
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Craig Hutchinson, W. Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
White v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 2:2008cv10956
Plaintiff:
Mark White
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Service, Craig Hutchinson, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
