Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Taylor-Yancy v. Sam's Club Incorporation, et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Shella Taylor-Yancy
Defendant:
Sam's Club Incorporation, Tony Rogers and Roy Guiterrez doing business as Roys-Handi-Van
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Rogers v. Exactech Inc et al
as 1:2023cv07929
Plaintiff:
Tony Rogers
Defendant:
Exactech Inc, Exactech U S Inc and Exactech US Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bio Gen LLC, et al v. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, et al
as 23-3237
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Bio Gen LLC, Drippers Vape Shop LLC, Cigarette Store LLC, doing business as Smoker Friendly and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Governor; in her official capacity, Tim Griffin, Attorney General; in his official capacity, Todd Murray, in his official capacity as prosecuting attorney for the State of Arkansas and others
Bio Gen LLC et al v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
Bio Gen LLC, Drippers Vape Shop LLC, Cigarette Store LLC doing business as Smoker Friendly and others
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, John Timothy Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Rogers v. Lowery et al
as 3:2023cv01936
Plaintiff:
Tony Rogers
Defendant:
Renata Lowery and Wexford Health Sources Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fayetteville Public Library et al v. Crawford County, Arkansas et al
as 5:2023cv05086
Plaintiff:
Fayetteville Public Library, Eureka Springs Carnegie Public Library, Central Arkansas Library System and others
Defendant:
Crawford County, Arkansas, Chris Keith, Todd Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Kristin Mayes, et al
as 23-15234
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KRISTIN K. MAYES, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, JENNIFER CUNICO, o in her official capacity as Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Intervenor:
BEN TOMA and WARREN PETERSEN
Rogers v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01066
Plaintiff:
Tony Rogers
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Vipin K. Shah, Terry Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Shah et al
as 3:2022cv00938
Plaintiff:
Tony Rogers
Defendant:
Vipin K. Shah, Terry Harris, Springer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16711
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
