Cases 1 - 10 of 14
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION et al v. AMERADA HESS CORP., et al
as 3:2015cv06468
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION , THE COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION , THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NEW JERSEY SPILL COMPENSATION FUND and others
Defendant:
AMERADA HESS CORP., LUKOIL AMERICAS CORPORATION, COASTAL EAGLE POINT OIL COMPANY and others
Cross_claimant:
GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC., LUKOIL AMERICAS CORPORATION, H.P. DELTA, INC. and others
Cross_defendant:
GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC., AMERADA HESS CORP., GETTY PROPERTIES CORP. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
GETTY PROPERTIES CORP.
Thirdparty_defendant:
H.P. DELTA, INC. , ROBERT MELECCI , DHANDI TRANSPORT, INC. and others
Counter_claimant:
H.P. DELTA, INC., DHANDI TRANSPORT, INC. and EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION
Counter_defendant:
GETTY PROPERTIES CORP., GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC. and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 14-3224
Plaintiff - Appellee:
City of New York, New York City Water Board and New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corp., Atlantic Richfield Company, BP America, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation and Mobile Corporation
Robare et al v. AC And S, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01291
Plaintiff:
Gordon Robare and Joan Robare
Defendant:
AC And S, Inc., A.W. Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jumonville et al v. Hercules Incorporated et al
as 3:2010cv00393
Defendant:
Allemania Chemical Company, American Petrofina, Incl, Ashland Chemical Company and others
Plaintiff:
Enoul Jumonville, Henry Jumonville and Jumonville Lands, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Headley et al v. Exxon Mobile Corporation et al
as 6:2010cv00273
Defendant:
Alon USA, Shell Energy North America (US), LP, Exxon Mobile Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Headley, Steven C Headley and Robert Headley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Congram et al v. Chevron USA Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv08232
Plaintiff:
Gary Congram and Fern Congram
Defendant:
Chevron USA Inc., Texaco Inc., Union Oil Company of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
McClurg et al v. Ingram Barge Company et al
as 1:2009cv00504
Plaintiff:
Patricia A McClurg and Terena McClurg
Defendant:
Ingram Barge Company, Seariver Maritime Financial Holdings Inc, Seariver Maritime Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brumley v. Akzona, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv01289
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Brumley, Jimmy Brumley and Jimmy Brumley
Defendant:
Akzona, Inc., American Cyanamid Company, BP Products North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2008cv00312
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff:
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, The Commisisoner of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, The Administrator of the New Jersey Spill Compensation Fund and others
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corp., Rosemore Inc., Getty Properties Corp. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Harbans Singh, Gurmail Singh and John and Jane Does Nos. 1-100
Not Classified By Court:
Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
H.P. Delta, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Robert Melecci and Dhandi Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Bowlin v. Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv00193
Plaintiff:
Linda Bowlin
Defendant:
Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation, Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation, Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
