Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Aker et al v. ABX Air, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00016
Plaintiff:
Arlene Fait, Billie Moore, Samantha Hamilton-Curtis and others
Defendant:
Green Township, Ohio, DHL, The Good Samaritan Hospital of Cincinnati, Ohio and others
Petitioner:
Ohio Contractors Association Advancement Foundation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Adams et al v. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
as 1:2018cv00475
Plaintiff:
Arlene Fait, Caidan Bailey, Christopher Atwood and others
Defendant:
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher Atwood, et al v. Medtronic, Inc., et al
as 16-4206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT ATWOOD, JOSHUA AULT, GAYLE BACHMANN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MEDTRONIC, INC. and MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC.
Bachman et al v. Cincinnati Children's Hopital Medical Center et al
as 1:2016cv00447
Plaintiff:
Gayle Bachman , Cindy Bartlett , Joseph Baumgardner and others
Defendant:
Cincinnati Children's Hopital Medical Center and Christ Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walsh et al v. Durrani et al
as 1:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
Tracey Walsh and Gerald Walsh
Defendant:
Abubakar Atiq Durrani , Center For Advanced Technologies, Inc. , West Chester Hospital, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Atwood et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00483
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Atwood , Joshua Ault , Gayle Bachmann and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALSH v. LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES et al
as 1:2011cv00676
Defendant:
LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES and THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
TRACEY WALSH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
