Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Weatherspoon v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00535
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
John Doe, Superintendent Tereda Hairston, Deputy Superintenden Katrina Reid and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Weatherspoon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2785
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Noelle Lee v. Robert Fisher, et al
as 21-15923
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM S. FISHER, ISABELLA D. GOREN, SONIA SYNGAL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOELLE LEE, derivatively on behalf of The Gap, Inc
Gardner v. WALMART INC.
as 3:2020cv09365
Plaintiff:
Tracy Gardner
Defendant:
WALMART INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Fisher et al
as 3:2020cv06163
Defendant:
Sonia Syngal, John J. Fisher, Amy Bohutinsky and others
Plaintiff:
Noelle Lee
Banks v. King et al
as 3:2020cv00482
Defendant:
Mr. Fillepip, Mrs. Michelle Jackson, Officer McKinnel and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Banks
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARDNER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv14280
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
TRACY GARDNER
Defendant:
PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, & JOHNSON JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARDNER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv00812
Plaintiff:
TRACY GARDNER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gardner et al v. The Town of Summit et al
as 5:2018cv00108
Plaintiff:
Tracy Gardner and Laquasha Martin
Defendant:
The Town of Summit and Safeway Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
