Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Hayes et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02644
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hayes and Tracy Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes v. Standard Insurance Company
as 3:2017cv01558
Plaintiff:
Traci Hayes
Defendant:
Standard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Frankel v. Norton et al
as 3:2016cv00779
Plaintiff:
Martin Frankel
Defendant:
Patrick Norton, Janet C. Hall, Salvation Army and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frankel v. Norton et al
as 1:2016cv02371
Defendant:
Walter Bush, Crack Ho Sharon, Janet C. Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Frankel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Izquierdo et al v. Titus County Sheriff Department et al
as 5:2014cv00118
Plaintiff:
Ruben Izquierdo and Maria Cordova-Batista
Defendant:
Titus County Sheriff Department, Chris Bragg, Brent D Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-17128
Plaintiff:
Traci Hayes and Douglas Hayes
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Hayes et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv17128
Plaintiff:
Traci Hayes and Douglas Hayes
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-16553
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joanenice Shields v. USDC-AZP
as 12-70991
:
In re: JOANENICE SHIELDS
Petitioner:
JOANENICE SHIELDS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Real Party In Interest:
FRONTIER TECHNOLOGY LLC, DBA MIcroAge LLC, JEFFREY MCKEEVER, Founder/CEO, TRACY HAYES, VP of Sales and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
