Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Northern Plains Resource Council et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00044
Plaintiff: Friends of the Earth, Bold Alliance, Northern Plains Resource Council and others
Defendant: LT. General Todd T. Semonite, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Intervenor Defendant: TC Energy Corporation, TransCanada Keystone Pipeline LP
Cause Of Action: Review of Agency Action-Environment
IEN, et al v. DOS, et al
as 19-35099
Plaintiff / Appellee: FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, BOLD ALLIANCE, INDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: THOMAS A. SHANNON, Jr., in his official capacity, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, RYAN K. ZINKE, in his official capacity and others
Intervenor: ROSEBUD SIOUX TRIBE, FORT BELKNAP INDIAN COMMUNITY
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: TRANSCANADA CORPORATION, TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE, LP
Amicus Curiae: ASSINIBOINE AND SIOUX TRIBES OF THE FORT PECK RESERVATION
Northern Plains, et al v. Thomas Shannon, Jr., et al
as 19-35064
Defendant / Appellee: RYAN K. ZINKE, in his official capacity, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, THOMAS A. SHANNON, Jr., in his official capacity and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: TRANSCANADA CORPORATION, TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE, LP
Plaintiff / Appellant: SIERRA CLUB, BOLD ALLIANCE, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and others
Undetermined: ROSEBUD SIOUX TRIBE, FORT BELKNAP INDIAN COMMUNITY
Amicus Curiae: ASSINIBOINE AND SIOUX TRIBES OF THE FORT PECK RESERVATION
IEN, et al v. DOS, et al
as 19-35036
Defendant / Appellee: THOMAS A. SHANNON, Jr., in his official capacity as U.S. Under Secretary of State, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, JAMES W. KURTH, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: TRANSCANADA CORPORATION, TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE, LP
Plaintiff / Appellant: INDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK, NORTH COAST RIVERS ALLIANCE
Amicus Curiae: ASSINIBOINE AND SIOUX TRIBES OF THE FORT PECK RESERVATION
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.52 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01370
Defendant: 0.44 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Portage Des Sioux, City of, TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP and others
Plaintiff: Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: Natural Gas Act
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.73 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01371
Defendant: Shell Pipe Line Corporation, 0.99 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Portage Des Sioux, City of and others
Plaintiff: Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: Natural Gas Act
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.18 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01353
Defendant: Shell Pipe Line Corporation, Stanolind Pipe Line Co., 0.59 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff: Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: Natural Gas Act
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.78 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01363
Defendant: Stanolind Pipe Line Co., Kathleen C. Thomas, TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP and others
Plaintiff: Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: Natural Gas Act
TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP et al v. Kerry et al
as 4:2016cv00036
Plaintiff: TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP , TC Oil Pipeline Operations Inc.
Defendant: John F Kerry , Loretta E. Lynch , Jeh Charles Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Declaratory Judgment
Craft-Rendon et al v. TransCanada Corporation et al
as 6:2015cv00374
Respondent: TransCanada Keystone Pipeline LP , Wood County Texas , Wood County Sherriff's Department
Plaintiff: Benjamin-Franklin Sequoyah Craft-Rendon , Shannon Kathleen Bebe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?