Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Johnson v. Day et al
as 2:2025cv00560
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Johnson
Defendant:
Travis Day
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. Day et al
as 2:2025cv00360
Plaintiff:
Bryan Clayton Roberts
Defendant:
Travis Day, Floyd Brooks, Gary Westcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Day et al
as 3:2025cv00129
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Smith
Respondent:
Travis Day, Rayburn Correctional Center and Elizabeth Murrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colvin v. Day et al
as 2:2025cv00279
Defendant:
Travis Day, Juan Martinez, Leslie Wheat and others
Plaintiff:
James Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Day
as 2:2025cv00158
Plaintiff:
Javan Caine Marshall
Defendant:
Travis Day
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reynolds v. Day
as 24-30742
Defendant:
Cynthia Crain Sumrall, Jennifer Bigner, Rhonda Wallace and others
Plaintiff:
Dashone Marcel Reynolds
Richards v. Wallace
as 24-30615
Defendant:
Rhonda B. Wallace, Lieutenant, Louisiana State, Nancy Landry, Secretary and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie J. Richards
Sanchez-Rodriguez v. Day
as 24-30516
Petitioner:
Jorge Sanchez-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Travis Day, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center
Cyr v. Department of Public Safety and Corrections State of Louisiana et al
as 2:2024cv01973
Defendant:
Henry McMurray, Justin Rester, Travis Day and others
Plaintiff:
Christian M Cyr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. Wallace et al
as 2:2024cv01529
Plaintiff:
Eddie Richards
Defendant:
Reed Wallace, Travis Day, Medical Director Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
