Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Kakar Kurtz v. Dr. Marie Lupica
as 23-7548
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHVETA KAKAR KURTZ, DANIEL L. KURTZ, solely in their roles as parentguardians, AMNA KAKAR KURTZ, a minor child and others
Defendant / Appellee: MARIE LUPICA, as an individual, Treating Physician and State Actor Operating Under Color of Law and NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL, /WeillCornell Medical Center
Defendant: DAVID HANSELL, as the Duly Appointed Commissioner of the New York City Administration for Children's Services, DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION, CITY OF NEW YORK and others
Carl Robinson v. Fair Acres Geriatric Center, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1713
Defendant / Appellee: TERI FARR, R.N., Director of Nursing at Fair Acres Geriatric Center, in his/her individual and official capacities, WILLIAM D'AMICO, Administrator for Fair Acres Geriatric Center, in his individual and official capacities, COUNTY OF DELAWARE, acting through the Delaware County Council and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CARL LOUIS ROBINSON, as Executor of the Estate of Georgia A. Hope, Deceased
Lurch, Jr. v. The City of NY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv06011
Plaintiff: Robert Derek Lurch, Jr.
Defendant: NYCHHC, Fadhle Alsula, Supervisors John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lurch, Jr. v. The City of NY et al
as 1:2019cv09378
Defendant: Officer John Doe, NYCHHC, Fadhle Alsula and others
Plaintiff: Robert Derek Lurch, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKiver v. The Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 19-1442
Defendant: The Federal Bureau of Prisons of New York
Defendant / Appellee: Treating Physician Anthony Bussanich and Pamela Hamilton, Dental Clinic Provider
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jeffrey L. McKiver
Moore v. Wetzel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01523
Defendant: Dr. Paul Noel, Treating Physician SCI Coal Township, John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff: Shawn Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Philip Turney, et al v. Henry Atencio, et al
as 18-80041
Plaintiff - Petitioner: PHILIP A. TURNEY, BILLY RAY BARTLETT, JAMES S. HENDRICKSON and others
Defendant - Respondent: HENRY ATENCIO, Director, Idaho Department of Correction, in his official capacity, RONA SIEGERT, RN, CCHP-RN, iin her individual and her official capacities for actions under color of law as Health Services Director, IDOC, JOHN MIGLIORI, Dr. MD, in his individual and his official capacities for actions under color of law as treating physician at SICI and others
Dorsey v. Wetzel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01261
Plaintiff: Joseph Marshall Dorsey, IV
Defendant: John Wetzel, Paul Noel, Bureau of Health Care Services, Assistant Medical Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mumia Abu-Jamal v. Secretary PA Dept of Corr, et al
as 17-1156
Plaintiff - Appellee: MUMIA ABU-JAMAL, PADRP
Defendant - Appellee: SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PAUL NOEL, DOC Bureau of Health Care Services Chief of Clinical Services, BUREAU OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES ASSISTANT MEDICAL DIRECTOR, member of Hepatitis C Treatment Committee and others
Defendant: CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS REPRESENTATIVES, on the Hepatitis C Treatment Committee and TREATING PHYSICIAN SCI MAHANOY
Defendant - Appellant: CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS
Mumia Abu-Jamal v. Secretary PA Dept of Corr, et al
as 17-1125
Plaintiff - Appellee: MUMIA ABU-JAMAL, PADRP
Defendant - Appellant: SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PAUL NOEL, DOC Bureau of Health Care Services Chief of Clinical Services, BUREAU OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES ASSISTANT MEDICAL DIRECTOR, member of Hepatitis C Treatment Committee and others
Defendant: CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS REPRESENTATIVES, on the Hepatitis C Treatment Committee and TREATING PHYSICIAN SCI MAHANOY
Defendant - Appellee: CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?