Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Fuller et al v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2024cv00057
Defendant:
Michael Anderson, Chad Putnam, Marjorie Glover and others
Plaintiff:
Antimease McArthur and Christal Fuller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Denson v. Riley et al
as 6:2024cv00045
Defendant:
Marla Riley and Trevonza Bobbitt
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lee Denson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Bobbitt
as 1:2024cv03123
Petitioner:
Kenneth Eason
Respondent:
Warden Trevonza Bobbitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AMOS v. BOBBITT et al
as 1:2024cv00097
Defendant:
WARDEN TREVONZA BOBBITT, JOHN AND OR JANE DOE, WARDEN TOMMY BOWEN and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE AMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. BOBBITT
as 4:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
DEMETRICE SCOTT
Respondent:
Warden TREVONZA BOBBITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MUTAZZ v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
SAID MUTAZZ
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, GREGORY SAMPSON, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheets v. Bobbitt
as 1:2023cv05999
Petitioner:
Mulik Sheets
Respondent:
Trevonza Bobbitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Canning v. Trevonza Bobbitt, et al
as 23-13992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN CANNING
Defendant / Appellee:
TREVONZA BOBBITT, JOSH WICKER, DEIDRA EDWARDS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Johnson v. Bobbitt
as 1:2023cv03524
Petitioner:
Quentin Lamar Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Trevonza Bobbitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DONALDSON v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
MISTEA DONALDSON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Jessica Howard, DASIA MOSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
