Cases 151 - 160 of 189
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Telecom & Technical Systems Inc

as 5:2008cv00794
Plaintiff:
Administrative Maintenance Fund, Contract Compliance Fund, Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union and others
Defendant:
Telecom & Technical Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Rubico Inc. et al

as 2:2009cv04973
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund and others
Defendant:
Rubico, Inc. and Roupen Tanielian
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Type:
Labor
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Trust Fund et al v. Alphaomega Electrical Contractors Corp.
as 2:2009cv04937
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Trust Fund, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund and others
Defendant:
Alphaomega Electrical Contractors Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type:
Labor
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. A B Electric, Inc.
as 2:2009cv04309
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
A B Electric, Inc. and A B Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Type:
Labor
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. MCEC, Inc.

as 2:2009cv02848
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
MCEC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Stone Electric No. 2, Inc.

as 2:2009cv02846
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Stone Electric No. 2, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Thorp Electric Co.
as 2:2009cv02722
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Thorp Electric Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Feiz Electric

as 2:2009cv01925
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustee of the Southern California IBEW-Neca Health Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Feiz Electric
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Butler Electric, Inc.
as 2:2009cv01675
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Butler Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Gartel Corp
as 2:2009cv01595
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Gartel Corp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.