Cases 21 - 30 of 184
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW NECA Pension Plan et al v. Robnett Electric, Inc.
as 2:2019cv06723
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National NECA IBEW Labor Management Cooperation Committee Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW NECA Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW NECA Health Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Robnett Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW NECA Pension Plan et al
as 2:2019cv06684
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National NECA IBEW Labor Management Cooperation Committee Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW NECA Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW NECA Health Trust Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Novoa Electric, Inc.
as 2:2019cv06689
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National NECA IBEW Labor Management Cooperation Committee Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW NECA Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW NECA Health Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Novoa Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW NECA Pension Plan et al v. Ferreira Construction Co., Inc.
as 5:2019cv01342
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National NECA IBEW Labor Management Cooperation Committee Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW NECA Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW NECA Health Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Ferreira Construction Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. DCD Electric, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02784
Plaintiff:
National Electrical Industry Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the National NECA-IBEW Labor-Management Cooperation Committee Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
DCD Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. GEM Contractors Group Inc.
as 2:2019cv00908
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the National NECA-IBEW Labor-Management Cooperation Committee Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee and others
Defendant:
GEM Contractors Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Adrian Duran
as 2:2018cv02436
Defendant:
Adrian Duran
Plaintiff:
Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, National Electrical Industry Fund, Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund and others
Unknown:
Matthew T Bechtel, Matthew T Bechtel, Matthew T Bechtel and others
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Kingston Electrical Contractor, Inc.
as 2:2016cv08131
Plaintiff:
Contract Compliance Fund, Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Kingston Electrical Contractor, Inc.
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Smart Tech Group, Inc.
as 8:2016cv01912
Plaintiff:
Contract Compliance Fund, Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Smart Tech Group, Inc.
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. M.L. Alexander Electric Co., Inc.
as 2:2016cv07704
Plaintiff:
Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, National Electrical Industry Fund, Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
M.L. Alexander Electric Co., Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.