Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Freeman v. Tuscaloosa County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 7:2023cv00853
Plaintiff:
Clent Freeman
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa County Jail and Ron Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Tuscaloosa County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Clent Freeman
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa County Jail and Ron Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moseley v. Tuscaloosa County Jail et al
as 7:2021cv00097
Defendant:
Eric Bailey, Tuscaloosa County Jail and Ron Abernathy
Plaintiff:
Julian Bradford Moseley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Tuscaloosa County Jail et al
as 7:2019cv00473
Defendant:
Indian Rivers and Tuscaloosa County Jail
Plaintiff:
Judvis Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Tuscaloosa Police Department et al
as 7:2018cv01685
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Tuscaloosa County Jail and Tuscaloosa Police Department
Plaintiff:
Judvis Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Tuscaloosa County Jail
as 7:2018cv00855
Plaintiff:
Judvis Wallace
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Tuscaloosa County Jail et al
as 7:2018cv00526
Plaintiff:
Joseph Earl Jenkins , Jr
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa County Jail, Sergeant Sanders, Shelia Little and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Tuscaloosa County Jail
as 7:2017cv02066
Plaintiff:
Judvis D. Wallace
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Abernathy et al
as 7:2017cv00775
Plaintiff:
Manzeroski Logan
Defendant:
Ron Abernathy and Tuscaloosa County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baynes v. Tuscaloosa County Jail
as 1:2016cv01893
Plaintiff:
Hershel Springfield Baynes
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
