Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Patent Armory Inc. v. Twitter, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00815
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Woodfield v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00780
Plaintiff:
Chris Woodfield
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc., X Corp., X Holdings I, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104 Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification Act
Arnold et al v. X Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv00528
Defendant:
X Corp., X Holdings Corp., Twitter Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Wolfram Arnold, Erik Froese, Tracy Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104 Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification Act
Cornet et al v. Twitter, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Cornet, Justine De Caires, Grae Kindel and others
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Daniel D'Ambly, et al v. Christian Exoo, et al
as 22-3034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL D'AMBLY
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN EXOO, a/k/a Antifash Gordon, ST. LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY, TRIBUNE PUBLISHING CO LLC and others
Defendant:
COHEN WEISS AND SIMON LLP
Nimitz Technologies LLC v. Twitter, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01364
Plaintiff:
Nimitz Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
D'AMBLY v. EXOO et al
as 2:2020cv12880
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN EXOO, VIJAYA GADDE, ANTIFASH GORDON and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL D'AMBLY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
B.E. Technology, L.L.C. v. Twitter, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00621
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc.
Plaintiff:
B.E. Technology, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1
Digi Portal LLC v. Twitter, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00808
Plaintiff:
Digi Portal LLC
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
In re Twitter, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2018cv00062
Defendant:
Richard Costolo , Anthony Noto , Jack Dorsey and others
Plaintiff:
Jim Porter
Consol_plaintiff:
Ernesto Espinoza and Francis Fleming
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
