Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Barnes v. Kentucky State Police Official Office et al
as 5:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Terquise Barnes
Defendant:
Kentucky State Police Official Office, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Fayette County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Johnson
as 23-30743
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Tyler Scott Johnson
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20927
Plaintiff:
TYLER SCOTT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ENGEBRETSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv06382
Plaintiff:
TYLER SCOTT ENGEBRETSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In Re: United States of America
as 23-1277
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Tyler Scott Johnston
USA v. Tyler Ridge
as 23-1602
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TYLER SCOTT-MONROE RIDGE
Kinard v. Sollie
as 3:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Tyler Scott Kinard
Defendant:
Billie Sollie
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sinclair et al v. Agile Web Studios et al
as 4:2023cv02690
Plaintiff:
Justine Sinclair and Dreamoway, Inc.
Defendant:
Agile Web Studios, Dynamic Digital Solutions, LLC, VTLogoDesign, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kinard v. Sollie
as 3:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Tyler Scott Kinard
Defendant:
Billie Sollie
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
