Cases 1 - 10 of 1,050
Whetstone v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
as 4:2025cv00373
Plaintiff:
James Whetstone
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sousa v. Danfotech et al
as 2:2025cv01834
Plaintiff:
Paulo Sousa
Defendant:
Danfotech, DANFOTECH, INC., DANFOTECH HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01092
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Rodriguez-Sanchez v. Sysco Corporation et al
as 2:2025cv00095
Plaintiff:
Maria Zenaida Rodriguez-Sanchez
Defendant:
IBP Beef, Tyson Foods, Inc., Sysco Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Devin Sires v. Tyson Foods, Inc., et al
as 25-1646
Plaintiff:
Devin Andrew Sires
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc.
Southpark Development, LLC et al v. Rieder et al
as 2:2025cv02029
Plaintiff:
Southpark Development, LLC, Sewell Dean Hammons and Karen Sue Rhine Hammons
Defendant:
David Rieder, Clarksville, City of and Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carroll v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
as 3:2025cv00191
Plaintiff:
Fatihaa Carroll
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Roberts v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
as 4:2025cv00264
Plaintiff:
William Roberts
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 4:2025cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.