Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Aikens v. Attorneys Office
as 6:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dewayne Aikens
Defendant:
U S Attorneys Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Connelly v. FBI CC Division et al
as 2:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Ryant Connelly
Defendant:
FBI CC Division and U. S. Attorney's Office CC Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsend v. Jacobs et al
as 3:2022cv03152
Plaintiff:
Robert Townsend
Defendant:
Tanner Jacobs, Sarah Seberger, Zack Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Chief U.S. District Judge
as 22-6604
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE, OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT GREENSBORO NC DIVISION, U. S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Hutchison et al v. Live Well Counseling et al
as 1:2021cv02311
Defendant:
Keli A. Detty, Virtual Technologies Ltd., Wade T. Moses and others
Plaintiff:
D.A.B., Anayenci Hutchison, A.P.H. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
U.S. Bank Trust National Association v. Abell et al
as 1:2020cv11834
Defendant:
Shilo McLeod-Abell, Shilo Luciano-Abell, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank Trust National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Paul et al
as 1:2020cv03611
Defendant:
Joseph Walker, Religious Ethics Committee, Pope Francis Paul and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00297
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Boniecki v. Macquade et al
as 2:2013cv12903
Plaintiff:
Teddy Lawrence Boniecki
Defendant:
Barbara Macquade, Robert Foley, U S Attorney's Office and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
