Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Abell et al v. U S Army Corps of Engineers
as 6:2023cv01484
Plaintiff:
Edward C Abell, Elaine Abell, IPOP, LLC and others
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and U S Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lemoine v. U S Army et al
as 6:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Deborah L Lemoine
Defendant:
United States Army, Jacob J Velasquez, Daniel S Biddulph and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Abell et al v. Corps of Engineers
as 6:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Edward C Abell, Elaine Abell, IPOP, LLC and others
Defendant:
U S Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Cavanaugh et al
as 2:2022xc04348
Not Classified By Court:
Kathleen Cavanaugh, Christine Wormuth, Department of the Army and others
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Dorsey v. USA et al
as 2:2022cv05197
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Dorsey
Defendant:
USA, Kenneth B Matheson and USA d/b/a U S Army Corps of Engineers Memphis District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Willis v. Army
as 2:2022cv01841
Plaintiff:
Carolyn T Willis
Defendant:
U S Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forestier v. USA et al
as 6:2021cv04327
Plaintiff:
Derrick J Forestier
Defendant:
USA and U S Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Pegasus Equine Guardian Association v. U.S. Army
as 2:2017cv00980
Plaintiff:
Pegasus Equine Guardian Association
Defendant:
U S Army and Gary M Brito
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Smith v. Army Corps of Engineers
as 3:2017cv00385
Plaintiff:
Tammy Smith
Defendant:
U S Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Burns v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2016cv00852
Plaintiff:
Burman Dalton Burns and Janice West
Defendant:
U S Army Corps of Engineers and U S Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
