Cases 1 - 10 of 11
STARK LINK ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT TRADING v. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
as 1:2020cv01939
Plaintiff:
STARK LINK ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT TRADING
Defendant:
U S Customs and Border Protection and U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03529
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
William G Kocol et al v. Several Unknown Named U S Customs and Border Protection et al
as 2:2013cv03511
Defendant:
Does and Several Unknown Named U S Customs and Border Protection
Plaintiff:
Timothy A Gajewski and William G Kocol
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv07246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Giusseppe Bottiglieri Shipping v. USA, et al
as 12-11215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GIUSSEPPE BOTTIGLIERI SHIPPING COMPANY S.P.A.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. COAST GUARD and U. S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION AGENCY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv08978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Irizarry-Rosado v. United States of America, et als
as 3:2011cv01121
Petitioner:
Nick Irizarry-Rosado
Respondent:
The United States of America, U. S. Attorney General, U. S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114
Cervantes v. Martinez, Et. Al.
as 5:2010cv00106
Plaintiff:
Maria M Cervantes
Defendant:
Olegario Martinez and U. S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
