Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Leebcor Services, LLC v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
as 23-1814
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEEBCOR SERVICES, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, USA, CHRISTINE WORMUTH, Secretary of the Army, in her official capacity, SCOTT A. SPELLMON, Lieutenant General, U.S. Army Chief of Engineers, in his official capacity and others
Leebcor Services, LLC v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, USA et al
as 5:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Leebcor Services, LLC
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, USA, Honorable Christine Wormuth, Secretary of the Army, in Her Official Capacity, Lieutenant General Scott A. Spellmon, U.S. Army Chief of Engineers, in His Official Capacity and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Cape Fear River Watch v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
as 22-2223
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CAPE FEAR RIVER WATCH, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE FEDERATION
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and BENJAMIN A. BENNETT, Colonel, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District Commander
United Bank v. Loudoun Mitigation Bank, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00400
Plaintiff:
United Bank
Defendant:
Loudoun Mitigation Bank, LLC, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Protection Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
South Carolina, State of v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 21-1085
Defendant / Appellant:
MAJOR GENERAL DIANA M. HOLLAND, in her official capacity as Commanding General, South Atlantic Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS SAVANNAH DISTRICT, RYAN D. MCCARTHY, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
SAVANNAH RIVERKEEPER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, AUGUSTA, GEORGIA, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL and others
Sierra Club v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 20-2042
Petitioner:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WILD VIRGINIA, APPALACHIAN VOICES and others
Respondent:
COLONEL PATRICK V. KINSMAN, in his official capacity as District Commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District, LIEUTENANT GENERAL SCOTT A. SPELLMON, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, WILLIAM T. WALKER, in his official capacity as Chief, Regulatory Branch, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District and others
Sierra Club v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 20-2039
Petitioner:
INDIAN CREEK WATERSHED ASSOCIATION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, APPALACHIAN VOICES and others
Respondent:
COLONEL JASON A. EVERS, in his official capacity as District Commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District, LIEUTENANT GENERAL SCOTT A. SPELLMON, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Bryant v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineer et al
as 2:2018cv03037
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineer, Attorney General of the United States, Charleston County Administrator and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony G Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coastal Conservation League v. US Army Corps of Engineers
as 16-2397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE and SOUTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE FEDERATION
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, LT GENERAL TODD T. SEMONITE, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, LT COLONEL MATTHEW LUZZATTO, in his official capacity as District Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District and others
Shortall et al v. Baltimore District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 1:2014cv03904
Plaintiff:
Purnell A. Shortall and Mary Ann Shortall
Defendant:
Baltimore District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
